Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Weber's Types of Social Action, Lecture notes of Social Theory

Max Weber;s soical action : value rational, traditional, effectives and end mean rational.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

seshadrinathan_hin
seshadrinathan_hin 🇺🇸

4.5

(15)

231 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
WEBER’S TYPES OF SOCIAL ACTION:
~ GENUS ~
value-rational (werkrational)
action in support of, in defense of, in commitment to a
particular value (not necessarily pursued by rational
means, by in some way that “makes sense”)
~ SPECIES ~
traditional
action entrenched through habit, dictated by custom,
past experience, the weight of history
affective
action stirred (even dictated) by an immediate
emotion, often precipitated by a charismatic figure
means-ends (goal) rational (zweckrational)
action consonant with logic, rational calculation,
instrumental assessment, sometimes translated as
“technocratic thinking”
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Weber's Types of Social Action and more Lecture notes Social Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

WEBER’S TYPES OF SOCIAL ACTION:

~ GENUS ~

value-rational ( werkrational ) – action in support of, in defense of, in commitment to a particular value (not necessarily pursued by rational means, by in some way that “makes sense”) ~ SPECIES ~ traditional – action entrenched through habit, dictated by custom, past experience, the weight of history affective – action stirred (even dictated) by an immediate emotion, often precipitated by a charismatic figure means-ends (goal) rational ( zweckrational ) – action consonant with logic, rational calculation, instrumental assessment, sometimes translated as “technocratic thinking”

Along with other students of Weber (Raymond Aron, Dennis Wrong) we will shift value-rational to the level of a genus, of which the other three are species. The first three—traditional, affective, means-ends rational—are all meaningful, compelling, “legitimate” if the value they each embody is seen as “rational,” i.e., given the belief in the appropriate value (the past, feeling, logical thought), they follow as the reasonable way to behave. (Note that we are working with a somewhat shifting definition of rational—moving from a strict calculation of means and ends at one end of the continuum to a generalized sense of appropriateness at the other.) Given this typology, which primarily distinguishes between logical and non- logical (or a-logical), rational and a-rational action, Weber has a means whereby he can deal with science as a specific type of human action as well as further look at it in its particular form as the science of human action.