Criteria 9-10 - Excellent 6-8 - Good 3-5 - Developing 1-2 - Beginning
A. Depth of
Analysis (Per
Criterion)
Provides exceptionally insightful
and thorough analysis for each
criterion (alignment, content,
design, effectiveness). Identifies
subtle strengths and weaknesses
with detailed reasoning.
Provides good analysis for
each criterion, identifying
clear strengths and
weaknesses with supporting
reasons.
Provides basic analysis for
each criterion, but may lack
depth or detailed reasoning
for identified strengths and
weaknesses.
Provides superficial or no
analysis for criteria, or
simply states opinions
without justification.
B. Specificity of
Feedback &
Examples
Feedback is highly specific,
constructive, and directly
references concrete examples from
the evaluated worksheet to support
claims. Offers actionable
suggestions for improvement.
Feedback is specific and
constructive, with some
direct references to the
evaluated worksheet. Offers
helpful suggestions for
improvement.
Feedback is somewhat
general or lacks specific
examples from the
worksheet. Suggestions for
improvement may be vague.
Feedback is generic,
unhelpful, or does not refer
to the evaluated worksheet.
Offers no constructive
suggestions.
C. Objectivity and
Professionalism
Evaluation is consistently objective,
fair, and professional in tone.
Avoids personal bias and focuses
solely on the worksheet's merits
and areas for development.
Evaluation is generally
objective and professional,
with minor instances of
subjective language. Mostly
fair in assessment.
Evaluation shows some
subjectivity or
unprofessional language.
May exhibit some bias in
assessment.
Evaluation is highly
subjective, unprofessional,
or demonstrates significant
bias.
D. Adherence to
Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation rigorously addresses all
four specified criteria (alignment,
content & activities, design &
presentation, overall effectiveness)
comprehensively and distinctly.
Evaluation addresses all
four specified criteria, but
one or two may be less
thoroughly covered.
Evaluation addresses most
criteria, but one or more
may be omitted or
superficially covered.
Evaluation fails to address
most or all of the specified
criteria.
E. Clarity and
Organization of
Evaluation
Evaluation is exceptionally clear,
well-organized, and easy to
understand. Follows a logical flow,
making the assessment
comprehensible and impactful.
Evaluation is clear and well-
organized, generally easy to
understand.
Evaluation has some clarity
issues or organizational
weaknesses, making it
occasionally difficult to
follow.
Evaluation is unclear,
disorganized, or difficult to
understand.
F. Overall
Constructive
Value
The evaluation provides significant
constructive value, offering clear
pathways for the worksheet
developer to improve their work and
demonstrating a deep
understanding of effective
instructional materials.
The evaluation provides
good constructive value,
offering pathways for
improvement and
demonstrating a solid
understanding of effective
instructional materials.
The evaluation provides
limited constructive value,
offering only minor
suggestions or
demonstrating a basic
understanding of effective
instructional materials.
The evaluation provides no
constructive value, offering
unhelpful or misleading
feedback.
