

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Mandatory Voting in America, POS 2041
Typology: Assignments
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Mandatory Voting in America POS 2041 Valencia College Should American citizens be required to vote? Mandatory voting as a political practice has far many negative impacts on the democracy of a people and the voters' rights. It is an essential exercise to a state and government because it ensures that voter-turnout increases; it equally enables all the people to participate in the elections, thus making their views and interests to be taken into consideration (William, 2011). Besides, mandatory voting makes voting a civic duty of the citizens who vote to strengthen their democracy. However, compulsory voting presents a polarized state with fractured structure of democracy and undermines Americans' rights in heightened ways. Solari argues that mandatory voting ends up with widespread inequality of representation and that leadership influence is not evenly distributed but biased in favor of more privileged citizens (Solari, 2008). Ideally, those with better education, higher incomes, and more incredible wealth participate in the voting process, leaving less advantaged citizens with no voice through the democratic vote. In dealing with such inequalities, American citizens should be required to vote. I stand on the position that compulsory voting is fundamental and a policy that needs to be embraced because it may eliminate inequality. Mandatory voting is beneficial because it enhances voter turnout, equalizes participation, and removes bias against less advantaged citizens. Solari stipulates that if by law, nearly everyone in a particular election zone is forced to vote, then the socio-economic inequalities will diminish because a larger fraction of the population will have an
opportunity to have a representative input on the voting process (Solari, 2008). Furthermore, by requiring the entire population to vote, compulsory voting creates ancillary changes. The increase in voters' number may escalate more substantial participation and interest in other political activities such as allocating national resources, public finance, and distribution of national projects and programs. Therefore, mandatory voting would tend to even out disparities ranging from income, education, and age, thus enhancing the political system's inclusiveness. According to Solari, one of the dangers associated with compulsory voting is the lack of choice in candidates, but the obligation by law to vote for one of the candidates nevertheless (Solari, 2008). The United States enjoys the dominance of two-party systems with little room for other parties to grow and have influence. I refute this counterargument because mandatory voting creates a free political environment and liberal democracy for other parties to grow and thrive. They find a stable state that enables them to participate in any democratic process. Furthermore, through mandatory voting, the third parties can nominate their candidates and compete for the popular votes in the general elections. When almost everybody votes, no large campaign funds are needed to goad voters to the polls (William, 2011). This principle will equally eliminate attack advertising and hypothetical speech because everyone would be required to vote.