Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Embeddedness - Sociology in Economic Life - Lecture Slides, Slides of Economic Sociology

It is the Lecture Slides of Sociology in Economic Life which includes Economic Principles in Everyday Life, Economic Citizenship, East Asian Miracle, Division of Labor etc. Key important points are: Embeddedness, Mark Granovetter, Karl Polanyi, Adam Smith, Granovetter on Smith, Granovetter on Polanyi, Course of Modernization, Economic Behavior, Ongoing Process, Reconstructed During Interaction

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/06/2013

gaggan
gaggan 🇮🇳

4.3

(50)

111 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture Note 3
“Embeddedness”
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Embeddedness - Sociology in Economic Life - Lecture Slides and more Slides Economic Sociology in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture Note 3

“Embeddedness”

From Adam Smith, Karl Polanyi to

Mark Granovetter

    1. Granovetter on Smith: undersocialized in the discussion of the perfect competition in the self- regulating market
      • “The fact that actors may have social relations with one another has been treated, if at all, as frictional drag that impedes competitive markets”
      • The level of embeddedness of economic behavior did not vanish in the course of modernization
    1. Granovetter on Polanyi: oversocialized; emphasize the customs, habits or norms that followed mechanically and automatically in economic process
      • The argument on how social influences individual behavior is rather mechanical. But indeed culture is not a once-for-all influence but an ongoing process, continuously constructed and reconstructed during interaction.

Market vs. Hierarchy (2)

  • Oliver E. Williamson and the Transaction Cost Approach
  • The transaction cost approach: to assess the capacities of different structures to harmonize relations between parties and to recognize that new structures arose in the service of these harmonizing purposes
  • Unit of analysis: transaction
  • Where does transaction cost come from? A transaction occurs when a good or service is transferred across a technologically separate interface. One stage of activity terminates and another begins. With a well-working interface, as with a well-working machine, these transfers occur smoothly.

Market vs. Hierarchy (3)

  • Low transaction cost: the parties to

the exchange operate harmoniously

  • High transaction cost: frequent

misunderstandings and conflicts

between the parties to the exchange lead to delays, breakdown, and other

malfunctions

Market vs. Hierarchy (5)

  • Transaction across a market interface
  • Externalized transaction
  • Problem: Opportunism encouraged by “information asymmetries and refers to a lack of candor or honesty in transactions, to include “self- interest seeking with guile:
  • e. g. imperfect market competition, limited information, sunk costs, and ”specific human capital” investment - Transaction within Hierarchical firms - Internalized transaction - Problem: Bounded rationality the inability of economic actors to anticipate properly the complex chain of contingencies; they can be handled within the firm’s “governance structure” instead of leading to complex negotiations

Market vs. Hierarchy (6: Efficient

Boundary)

S 1

D-

S 2 S 3

D-B

C1-0 C2-0 C3-

C1-B C2-B C3-B

R

S1, S2, S3: Core production stages; R: Raw materials;

Component supply: C1-B, C2-B, C3-B (if the firm buy its components); C1-0, C2-0, C3-0 (if the firm makes it own components)

Distribution: D-B (if the firm uses market distribution); D-0 (if the firm uses own distribution.

an actual transaction; a potential transaction Docsity.com

Granovetter’s “Social

Embeddedness” (2)

    1. Inter-personal relationship: Trust and Malfeasance
  • While social relations may indeed often be a necessary condition for trust and trustworthy behavior, they are not sufficient to guarantee these and may even provide occasion and means for malfeasance and conflict on a scale larger than in their absence. Why?
  • 2-1: The trust engendered by personal relations presents, by its very existence, enhanced opportunity for malfeasance.
  • 2-2: Force and fraud are most efficiently pursued by teams, and the structure of these teams requires a level of internal trust that usually follows preexisting lines of relationship.

Granovetter’s “Social

Embeddedness” (3)

  • 2-3: The extent of disorder resulting from force and fraud depends very much on how the network of social relations is structured.
  • A. The presence of social relations inhibits malfeasance: More extended and large-scale disorder results from coalitions of combatants, impossible without prior relations. … In the business world, where conflicts are relatively tame unless each side can escalate by calling on substantial happens in attempts to implement or forestall takeovers.
  • B. Disorder and malfeasance occur when social relations are absent. … But the level of malfeasance available in a truly atomized social situation is fairly low; instances can only be episodic, unconnected, small scale.

Clifford Geertz, the Bizaar Trade

(1)

http://www.nku.edu/~anthro/requirements.html

http://www.wizweb.com/~susan/kyrgyz/pictures.html

http://www.womenforwomen.org/projectindependence/Afghanphotos.htm Docsity.com

The Bazaar Trade (2)

  • Commodity exchange is less based on truisms

but on information flow

  • The control of information flow on the message

such as product quality, prices, and production

costs

  • Clientalization: a particular purveyor-customer

relationship based on symmetrical, egalitarian,

and oppositional interaction

  • “Whatever the relative power, wealth,

knowledge, skill, or status of the participants—

and it can be markedly uneven—clientship is a

reciprocal matter”