Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Deriving the PIH Formula: Certainty Equivalence Principle, Study notes of Economics

The derivation of the pih (per capita income-consumption) formula in the context of the certainty equivalence principle. The author, sang yoon (tim) lee, discusses the individual problem, the first-order conditions, and the assumption of β(1+r) = 1 leading to the result that the marginal utility function is the same for all time periods. The document also mentions friedman's conjecture, which suggests this holds true even in the stochastic case.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 09/02/2009

koofers-user-yvp
koofers-user-yvp 🇺🇸

2

(1)

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Econ 714: Deriving the PIH Formula
Sang Yoon (Tim) Lee
March 10, 2007
Solve the deterministic individual problem
max
{ct,at+1}
t=0
βtu(ct)
s.t. ct+at+1=yt+ (1+r)att
F.O.C.’s are
ct:u0(ct) = λt
at+1:λt=β(1+r)λt+1
Assuming β(1+r) = 1, we obtain
u0(ct) = u0(ct+1).
Hence if u(·)is strictly concave, ct+j=ctfor all j. Then writing out the budget constraints,
ct+at+1=yt+ (1+r)at
ct+at+2=yt+1+ (1+r)at+1
ct+at+3=yt+2+ (1+r)at+2
ct+at+4=yt+3+ (1+r)at+3
· · ·
Multiply iteratively by 1
1+rto get
ct+at+1=yt+ (1+r)at
1
1+rct+1
1+rat+2=1
1+ryt+1+at+1
(1
1+r)2ct+ ( 1
1+r)2at+3= ( 1
1+r)2yt+2+ ( 1
1+r)at+2
(1
1+r)3ct+ ( 1
1+r)3at+4= ( 1
1+r)3yt+3+ ( 1
1+r)2at+3
· · ·
1
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Deriving the PIH Formula: Certainty Equivalence Principle and more Study notes Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

Econ 714: Deriving the PIH Formula

Sang Yoon (Tim) Lee

March 10, 2007

Solve the deterministic individual problem

max {ct,at+ 1 }

t= 0

β tu(ct)

s.t. ct + at+ 1 = yt + ( 1 + r)at ∀t

F.O.C.’s are

ct : u′(ct) = λ t at+ 1 : λ t = β ( 1 + r) λ t+ 1

Assuming β ( 1 + r) = 1 , we obtain

u′(ct) = u′(ct+ 1 ).

Hence if u(·) is strictly concave, ct+j = ct for all j. Then writing out the budget constraints,

ct + at+ 1 = yt + ( 1 + r)at ct + at+ 2 = yt+ 1 + ( 1 + r)at+ 1 ct + at+ 3 = yt+ 2 + ( 1 + r)at+ 2 ct + at+ 4 = yt+ 3 + ( 1 + r)at+ 3 · · ·

Multiply iteratively by (^11) +r to get

ct + at+ 1 = yt + ( 1 + r)at 1 1 + r ct +

1 + r at+ 2 =

1 + r yt+ 1 + at+ 1

(

1 + r )^2 ct + (

1 + r )^2 at+ 3 = (

1 + r )^2 yt+ 2 + (

1 + r )at+ 2

(

1 + r )^3 ct + (

1 + r )^3 at+ 4 = (

1 + r )^3 yt+ 3 + (

1 + r )^2 at+ 3 · · ·

1

Then adding up LHS’s and RHS’s, notice that the a’s cancel out, so we obtain

∞ ∑ j= 0

1 + r )jct + lim J→∞

1 + r )J^ at+J+ 1 =

∞ ∑ j= 0

1 + r )jyt+j + ( 1 + r)at

By the TVC or borrowing constraint, the last term of LHS is 0. Hence

1 + r r ct =

∞ ∑ j= 0

1 + r )jyt+j + ( 1 + r)at

So

ct = r 1 + r

yt +

∞ ∑ j= 1

1 + r )jyt+j + ( 1 + r)at

Friedman’s conjecture is that this holds even in the stochastic case:

ct =

r 1 + r

yt +

∞ ∑ j= 1

1 + r )j E tyt+j + ( 1 + r)at

This is called ”certainty equivalence,” a principle that is exploited in many other appli- cations as well to show that the solution to a stochastic problem coincides with its deter- ministic counterpart. Of course, it is something that has to be shown case by case, not a

universal property.