

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Two problem cases related to contractual obligations and delays in delivery. The first case examines whether a seller (joey) is guilty of legal delay or default for failing to deliver a motorcycle to the buyer (vic) on the agreed date. The second case explores the rights of a buyer (joey) when the seller (vic) fails to provide a laptop on the agreed date for the buyer's online classes. The document also addresses the rights of the buyer when the seller fails to repair the buyer's laptop, and the conditions under which the seller may be held responsible even in the case of a fortuitous event. Insights into the legal principles governing contractual obligations, delays, and the allocation of risk, as outlined in the philippine civil code. By analyzing these problem cases, the document aims to help readers understand the nuances of contractual relationships and the legal remedies available to parties in the event of non-performance or unforeseen circumstances.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Vic bought the one and only motorcycle of Joey and Joey promised to deliver the motorcycle on September 15, 2022 but Joey failed to deliver the motorcycle on the said date and even until now. Vic said that Joey is guilty of legal delay or default. a. Is Vic correct? --- In the ART. 1169 “Those who obliged to deliver or to do something incur in delay from the time the oblige judicially or extrajudicially demands from them the fulfillment of their obligation.” Vic is wrong, Joey is not guilty of legal delay or default, but he is only in an ordinary delay in the absence of demand from Vic. Although a period had been fixed for the fulfillment of the obligation. The law presumes that Vic is giving Joey an extension of time within which to deliver the motorcycle. hence, there is no breach of obligation. b. What if the motorcycle was burned by the rebels on September 16 or one day after schedule date of delivery, can Vic hold Joey responsible? --- In the article 1174 “when the nature of obligation requires the assumption of risk, no person shall be responsible for those events which could not be foreseen, or those though foreseen were inevitable.” If the motorcycle was burned on September 16 due to fortuitous event Joey is not liable if no demand was made by Vic. His obligation is extinguished. PROBLEM CASE 2: Vic bound himself to provide Joey a laptop on September 11. 2022 for is online class but Vic failed to provide Joey a laptop on the said date. What is the right of Joey? Explain (5 points) --- In ART. 1165 “ When what is deliver is a determinate thing, the creditor, in addition to the right granted to him by ART.1170 may compel the debtor to make the delivery. Joey can demand and compel to Vic to deliver the laptop. 4.) Vic obliged to repair the laptop of Joey but Vic failed to repair the laptop of Joey. What is the right of Joey? (5 points) 5.) Vic bound himself to give his one and only laptop to Joey for Joey's online class but the laptop Was destroyed by fire without any fault on the part of Vic before delivery. What was required to make Vic responsible even in case of fortuitous event? --- In the ART. 1181 “In conditional conditions, the acquisition of rights, as well as the extinguishment or loss of those already acquired, shall depend upon the happening of the event which constitutes
the conditions. In this problem Joey has a right to receive the car from Vic, However he can only demand the delivery of the car if he already fulfill the condition to past all his subject first.